Ethical Dilemmas Facing Social Workers Social Work Essay

Ethical Dilemmas Facing br separately Workers Social Work hearSocial doers face ethical dilemmas on a daily basis, Banks illustrates this in her quotation ethical dilemmas occur when the companion satisfactory engageer sees herself as preen most a choice between two adjoinly unwelcoming alternatives, which may relate a conflict of honour open harbors, and it is non clear which choice leave behind be the indemnify one (Banks 200613). Banks implies that loving endureers argon often refer in soulfulnessal and even painful issues and ethical judgements in genial work that argon near mankindkind welf atomic number 18 (Banks 2006155). This poses m any(prenominal) take exceptions as decisions made are likely to be action changing for returns mappingrs. It is therefore eventful for a hearty worker to be able to justify natural action (or inaction) accordingly. The facts of a case alone do- nonhingnot determine what action must be resignn, it would be im possible to make choices without value (Beckett and Maynard 20057). It is all important(p) for a hearty worker to switch a strong value arse from which they work. In some instances problems may arise as favorable workers come into the profession with their own set of ad hominem value and these may conflict with their overlord set. Hence what Banks refers to as conflict of moral set (Banks 200613). Personal values cannot simply be eradicated beca do they conflict with professional values, besides we must keep our values and assumptions under review, and be open to some other arguments and other ideas (Beckett and Maynard 200517). In the case scenario of the Bertrams the alternatives are unwelcoming and in order to pilot the value maze in favorable work (Wilson, Ruch, Lymbery and Cooper 200892) mixer workers use various theories to inform employ.Kantism also referred to as deontology was derived from the ideas of philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Kant cogitated pe ople should be treated as an end and not a gist to an end. By this Kant plasteredt people should be valued and pryed as an individual and not used for the benefit of others. Hence, Kant believed that everyone should be treated equally. Kants ideology was to set aside peoples view of religion and spiritual beliefs and move to the idea of universe rational. rationalness enables people to understand what their duties are and how their duties enlighten what they do in the initiation (Parrott 2010 500). Kant also believed that by using reason this would develop a concordant moral system of rules. In the case of the Bertrams if the friendly worker were to use the deontological positioning to guide her decision- qualification it would be important to value Mrs Bertram as a person because the core of this perspective is extol for persons (Beckett Maynard 200535). This goes hand in hand with the British Association of Social Workers (BASW) Code of Ethics key principles Respect f or human dignity Value for every human being, their beliefs, goals, preferences and asks and Respect for human rights and self determination (BASW 2010).Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) developed the philosophical theory of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism looks at the consequences of actions balance the relative advantages and disadvantages of a special course of action, (Parrott 2010 54)Therefore one persons pitiful is acceptable as the greatest number of people is happy. There are two principles of utilitarianism, the principles of justice and return. The principle of justice is about being equal and fair as the value of everyones happiness should be the aforementioned(prenominal). The principle of utility signifies the greatest good for everyone. In many cases these two principles clash as the minority of people are unhappy. In the case scenario of the Bertrams her happiness should be valued and it would be important to withdraw the repercussions of going against her wishes if it were construeed in her top hat interests. A companionable worker would be expected to balance Mrs Bertrams right to self-determination, her safety and the concerns of her family for her welfare as it is often the kind workers job to task the whole situation and work for a solution in the go around interests of all guard-to doe with (Banks 2006167).Virtue morality is a theory that looks into an individuals character. Ones deservingness ethical motive are developed by their personal belief system and this determines their character. Virtue moral philosophy is an approach according to which the basic judgments in ethics are judgments about character (Statman, 19977). Ethical issues are embedded in alliances and responsibilities. An individual may lie to be seen as virtuous because they fate to be seen as an honest person. Radical social work is seen as belonging to an area of social work which can also be known as critical or activist social work. The mathematical group position takes a transformational view of social work, and as such is concerned with transforming society to benefit the most oppressed rather than focusing on the individual (Hill, 2010). Payne (1997) suggests some typical views are that problems are defined as social and structural rather than individual. McIntyre (1982) cited in Payne (1997) summarises the radical approaches criticisms of traditional social work as traditional social work reduces complex social problems into individual psychological ones, it cuts military service users off from others who may share the same problem and it reinforces the capitalist social order that is oppressive. The radical position sees the professionalization of social work as alienating workers from service users.Praxis is the move of thinking and acting. It is like a spiral of thought and action, or a praxis spiral. Praxis is integral to social work entrust and comes in the form of reflection. In social work theory, praxis is the refle xive blood between theories and action. It describes a cyclical process of social work interactions developing new theories and refining old ones. In order to work anti-oppressively social workers impoverishment to reflect on factors that influence their practice they then need to incorporate the results of this reflection into their practice (Lee, 2001).Downie and Telfer (1969, 1980) state that respect can be regarded as an active sympathy towards some other human being (Banks S, 2006 29). Darwell (1995) outlines two types of respect, recognition respect and appraisal respect. Recognition respect is in essence when a human being is worthy of respect whether it is for something they eat communicated verbally or through their actions. Appraisal respect is acknowledging ones qualities. The level of respect would reflect on the qualities guiden. Kantism has had an influence on the moral principle of respect in a consanguinity between a social worker and the service user. (Banks S, 2006 31) In order for a social worker to show full respect there are four key elements that take a shit to be met, these are, acknowledgement, preservation, non-destruction and engagement (Banks and Gallagher, 2009).Relativism suggests that all points of view are equally sound and the individual determines what is full-strength and relative for individuals. Relativism theorises that truth is diametrical for diffe exact people, not simply that different people believe different things to be dependable. intrinsic relativism allows us to be rulers of our own principles and how we chose to live our lives. Cultural relativism is the view that moral beliefs and practises vary with and depend on the human needs and social conditions of erupticular cultures so that no moral belief can be universally true. (A E Holmes 1984). is this a direct quote? Descriptive Ethical relativism believes that different cultures draw different moral values and normative ethical relativism suggests that separately culture is right unto itself.The Collins English Dictionary (2009) defines values as the moral principles and beliefs of a person or group and ethics as a social, religious or civil mandate of behaviour considered correct, specially that of a particular group, profession, or individual. Therefore values can be seen as the fundamental beliefs that an individual or group holds to be true and ethics the more formalised rules or guidelines of an organization or society. Banks (2010) states that values are regarded as particular types of belief that people hold about what is regarded as worthy or valuable. (direct quote ?need pg number) Although values are personal to us as individuals, they may also be dual-lane by the society or culture in which we live. Our values are formed through personal development and socialisation and leave behind be influenced by both past and present experiences. (Parrott, 2010) Dubois and Miley (1996) state ethics are concerned with wh at people consider right while values are concerned with what people consider good. Most moral philosophers would define ethics as a singular term, which is used to describe a break of philosophy concerned with the study of Morality, moral problems and moral judgements (Frankena, 1963 cited in Banks, 2006 scallywag number). According to Parrott (2010), ethics can be seen to guide an action and are there to inform and influence any judgements made according to the professional value base of social work. Reamer (2006) provides an insight into the historical origins of values and ethics in social cover and states that they have been at the tail end of social cares mission since its inception. He suggests that social work values and ethics come from four distinct stages the morality head the values spot the ethical theory and decision-making period and the ethical standards and risk management period (Reamer, 2006). These have culminated in the General Social Care Councils (GSCC) code of carry on that is in place today (Barnard, 2008).Social workers are duty recant to adhere to the GSCC codes of practice which acts as an ethical framework. A written code of ethics enables social workers to judge their practice against an ethical standard and enables service users to understand what conduct they should expect from their social worker. If social workers are considered to be in breach of the GSCC codes they can be removed from the social care register and no longer practice. Professional social workers must take responsibility for their actions as they hold a position of trust and baron that is legitimised by the state making ethics an important factor in accountability. The impaction of all practice on service users can be said to be powerful and therefore the ethics and value base emphasises the importance that the moral standing of service users is equal to that of the professional (Hugman, 2008). The theme Occupation Standards (NOS) for Social Worker s state clearly that values and ethics are central to being a competent practitioner. Parrott (2010) suggests that values are important to social work as they provide a common set of principles, which social workers can use and develop as a meat of working in an ethical way with service users.(direct quote ? pg number) He goes on to say that they guide professional behaviour, wait on importanttain a professional identity and protect service users from malpractice. It is important to clarify ones personal values in order to increase ones awareness of the potential conflicts and the impact these may have on ethical decision making. A persons ethnical experiences and background will affect the decisions they make and may bias their behaviour. Social workers must first clarify their own value stance in relation to value-laden issues they meet in practice situations if they want to be true to themselves and to their profession (Dolgoff, 200954).When linking moral philosophy and ethic al dilemmas to social work practice it is important to acknowledge that no one theory provides an answer. Traditionally social work has taken the Kantian approach and focused on the social worker / service user relationship. The need for social work to challenge inequality and oppression on an individual and structural level means radical social work is also still relevant. An overall Kantian Utilitarian Radical approach may be better. (Banks, 2006) The right of a service user to self determination may conflict with a social workers statutory duty if they are potentially endangering their own life or that of others (Clifford and Burke, 2009). Neil Thompson (2006, p40) defines oppression as inhuman or degrading give-and-take of individuals or groups hardship or injustice brought about by the strength of one group over another the negative and demeaning use of power. It often involves disregarding the rights of an individual or group and is thus a denial of citizenship. Service users will predominately come from oppressed and marginalised groups and it is crucial that social workers acknowledge institutional discrimination and avoid inadvertently stereotyping service users, heighten existing oppressions. (Thompson, 2008) Social workers need to be aware of the unequal dispersal of power at bottom organisations and decide how best to advocate and negotiate within these organisations for the best interest of the service user, even if it involves challenging the structure and values of an organisation from within (Dominelli, 2002). Paternalism focuses on the right for social workers with knowledge, authority, and skills to go into the lives of those who need their help, either by self referral or referrals from other professions. Mrs Bertram has been referred by another professional because of her Alzheimers. Ethical awareness is an important part of social work as it gives the social worker the ability and commitment to work alongside other professional s and service users. The Utilitarian view is consequential with the results disposed as much consideration as possible. Therefore when thinking about practice this approach would say to think of the persons outcome (future) when dealing with the present situation. This would mean weighing the good with the bad. The radical approach would empower the service user into change enabling them to overcome problems and equip them with techniques to deal with these independently in the future. Social workers should involve the service user in the decision making process, working in partnership and keeping them fully informed about their case.The starting point of dealing with this case would be an discernment of the Bertrams situation. The assessment task when undertaken in a professional and informed manner is recognise and sets the foundation for further interventions (Wilson, Ruch, Lymbery and Cooper 2008269). The Bertrams financial situation is unclear as it appears that Mr Bertram d oesnt have much inheritance money left which has led to rent arrears. This situation would need to be resolved soon as their landlord is toilsome to evict them for rent arrears and the state of the flat, which could render them both homeless. Mrs Bertrams insight appears to be severely impaired by her end stage Alzheimers and an assessment of the wellness risks may require securing detailed information from the GP about Mrs Bertrams Alzheimers and other health issues, and the likely prognosis. Mr Bertram is believed to be an alcoholic and this could have implications for his health. The likelihood of a positive outcome would perhaps be increased if Mr Bertram could be offered help for alcoholism as well as a carers assessment to train what his needs are. He spends considerable time at his club, leaving his married woman alone in the house vulnerable and at risk. Mrs Bertrams daughters distrust Mr Bertram and believe its in her best interest to be moved into residential care. for wards her illness advanced Mrs Bertram stated she wanted to stay with her husband. Possible options to consider after the assessment would be providing support for Mr and Mrs Bertram at home, moving them into provide accommodation together or moving Mrs Bertram into residential care. All these alternatives may be unwelcoming to the Bertrams therefore in order to bring about any change it would be important to first build a relationship with both Mr Bertram and Mrs Bertram and her daughters applying the Kantist view that the truth is told. This could mean arduous to communicate with Mrs Bertram at select times when she is more lucid and can participate as much as possible. It is important to develop/construct a shared understanding of the problem(s) being faced (Wilson, Ruch, Lymbery and Cooper, 2008282). Judgements should be informed directly by what Mr and Mrs Bertram say about their circumstances. Mr and Mrs Bertram must have a key part in the assessment of their situation, and any issues should be shared allowing them to continue to have as much choice as possible.The strengths of this plan are that Mr and Mrs Bertram will be involved in the care plan and will be able to express their views, as well as Mrs Bertrams daughters being able to contribute towards the care plan. This may build a strong relationship with the family and build on trust so they do co- operate and consider all the options as they will understand that the strategy would be for the health and well being of both Mr and Mrs Bertram. As social workers we need to have a basic understanding of what the Bertrams values are as it would be difficult to empathise and get the necessary understanding of their wishes if we do not. As social workers we could then possibly struggle to make progress when trying to help the Bertrams. This professional development is important as we will use this type of growth everyday in the workplace. In this case the main value/wish seems to be that the Bertrams st ayed together in their home.A social workers personal values may inform their understanding of practice. However, a social worker needs to follow the broader framework provided by anti-oppressive social work ethics. The framework provided allows a place for personal values but challenges social workers to place them within the wider framework where they are accountable to others and they must discontinue from imposing their values and in fact question them. (Clifford and Burke, 2009) Different contributions are made by various ethical perspectives in any given situation and these must be considered. Ethical perspectives must be considered in light of an anti-oppressive approach to practice and in relation to each other as there are occasions when the different perspectives conflict. Social workers have an obligation to work in a way that demonstrates not unaccompanied knowledge of relevant ethical concepts and local laws but also a broader awareness of how ethical values are relat ed to social inequalities and diversities (Clifford and Burke, 2009203) reciprocation Count 2993 (including author details in brackets)